Friday, April 13, 2012

Assignment #12- Thinking Critically About Evidence

My augured thesis is " Should CPS schools admit to longer school days which help prepare students but also interfere with teachers financially".
  • My most compelling evidence is that students will have more time to be properly taught and give them more time for educational purpose.Having lengthier school will give children time to catch up with assignments that they have fell back a upon.This will keep students off the street and keep them out of trouble and out of harms ways. Another positive that comes for longer school days is that it will allow parents time to themselves in which they can catch up on their own time or work if need. 
  • My weakest evidence that I clams is that teacher will be effect but longer school days. Not referring that teacher wont be, teacher will lose pay and for well that working for free is not what they intend to do. 
My strongest evidence may seem like a positive and my weakest seem like a negative and seem that I am for longer school days but i am not. There may issues that occur due to this topic such as teacher working for free is idea that our society does not believe in. Many believe that if we work we should be paid for the time that we worked for. Teacher will refuse to work for if not paid and will surly boycott that rule. This then leave students will no education to learn of. Making parents angry that their child is not getting an education due to this. There is a bigger picture that lays behind more then we know then what in font. We must look at it before taking a side on who is really effective.         

No comments:

Post a Comment